Band Of Baroda Rs 6,000-cr forex scam


Bank of Baroda had a tough day when CBI and Enforcement Directorate (ED) carried out searches at its branches in connection with the alleged Rs 6100 crore black money which was transferred to Hong Kong. All together six people have been arrested in what is now known as the Forex scam.
Joint team of CBI and ED conducted searches at three premises including residences of Bank of Baroda’s AGM SK Garg and Jainesh Dubey, foreign exchange officer with the bank. As perThe Indian Express report, CBI said the two officials have been found to be involved in the illegitimate transfer of the amount to Hong Kong. Accounts of 60 companies opened at the Ashok Vihar branch of the bank in Delhi, a relatively new branch are under scanner.
The case was registered after the bank found unusual remittances during an audit of its accounts.  CBI had registered the case on a complaint from the bank under the sections of Indian Penal Code and Prevention of Corruption Act against 59 current account holders and unknown bank officials and private persons.  CBI had found documents related to the illegitimate money transfers.
As per the published report in Economic Times, the bank too is probing the matter independently and will see if its software systems were adequate and lived up to the promise of sensing suspicious transactions.
The new branch of Bank of Baroda had obtained permission to accept forex transactions in 2013 after which, forex business of its Delhi branch sore up to RS 21,529 crore. The bank is now functioning without an MD and CEO. Though the government has appointed VBHC Value Homes managing director and CEO PS Jayakumar as the new managing director of Bank of Baroda in August, he is yet to take charge. Bank of Baroda detected a Rs 350 crore bill discounting irregularity and initiated an investigation into the matter. The bank discounted bills worth Rs 350 crore but the payment never came.
MODUS OPERANDI
The scam is traced to HDFC bank accounts. Prima facie it seems that two different types of transactions took place, but they can be related.
In the first transaction, dummy companies were opened in Hong Kong. The exporter, who had foreign exchange black money stashed abroad, used these entities as clients who sent the black money to India to make the transaction look genuine. Government on receiving the foreign exchange disbursed the duty drawback money to the exporter since the entire transaction was closed. Government uses the duty drawback scheme to promote exports in which refund is given by the government to recoup the amount paid by way of custom and excise duties on the raw materials used and service tax used for the manufacture of exported goods.
As per the report in Business Standard, the problem as ED states is that the traders evaded custom duties and over-claim duties to generate slush funds. Through this mechanism, two purposes were achieved. First, the unaccounted black money residing abroad come to India as white money and the exporter also generates extra income by duping the government through its own export incentive schemes.
Bank of Baroda in its communication to the  stock exchanges said that between May 2014 and August 2105, 5853 outward foreign remittances of Rs 3,500 crore for the purpose of advance remittances was recorded. Funds were sent through 38 current accounts to various overseas parties numbering to 400, based in UAE and  Hong Kong.
The modus operandi in this transaction was that a number of current accounts were opened in the Ashok Vihar branch. As per our banking system, a remittance of up to $100,000 is automatically cleared. The money launderers smartly exploited this loophole to pass under the radar. They selected the commodities which are prone to cancellations on account of quality or sharp price fluctuations like fruits and rice.
ED arrested Kamal Kalra, working with the foreign exchange division of HDFC bank  and three other individuals –  Chandan Bhatia, Gurucharan Singh Dhawan and Sanjay Aggarwal (none of them working with the bank).
ED said that Kalra was helping Bhatia and Aggarwal in remitting the amount through BOB against a commission of 30-50 paise per dollar remitted abroad.
Bhatia’s role was in forming companies in India and remitting money to the companies based in Hong Kong, Dhawan, an exporter of garments helped Bhatia. He allegedly obtained duty drawback to the tune of Rs 15 crore in a short period of 6-7 months.
RULES THAT WERE NOT FOLLOWED
The entire scam came out of cocoon because the banks officials pointed out the suspicious transactions to the investigating agencies. Banks are expected to raise exceptional transaction report and suspicious transaction report with the RBI in case of discrepancies. The delay in pointing out these discrepancies resulted in the scam gaining momentum.
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
Since the operations started in August 2014, its planning would have taken a few months earlier, which coincides with the coming to power of the new government.  The advance remittances to import scheme has been put to use transfer black money out of India on fears of it being detected.
One needs to know, whose money it is and how such a huge amount went unnoticed.

SOURCES: Indian Express,Economic Times,Business Standard, Image Source: wikimapia

Jayalalithaa jailed for 4 years in disproportionate assets case, fined Rs 100 crore

Jayalalithaa (Ex. Chief Minister Tamil Nadu)
DATED: 28, september 2014
Following is the course the disproportionate assets case against Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa has traversed, seeing legal and political twists and turns in the last 18 years after the DMK government decided to form Special Court on coming to power in 1996.

1996:
 Dr Subramanian Swamy, then a leader of Janata Party, files a case against Jayalalithaa alleging that during her tenure as Chief Minister from 1991 to 1996, she amassed properties worth Rs 66.65 crore disproportionate to her known sources of income.

Dec 7, 1996:
 Jayalalitha arrested. Many allegations follow, including accumulation of disproportionate assets.
1997: A prosecution launched in Additional Sessions Court in Chennai against Jayalalithaa and three others for having assets "disproportionate" to their known income.
June 4, 1997: Charge-sheeted for offences under Sections 120-B IPC, 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
October 1, 1997: Madras High Court dismisses three petitions by Jayalalitha including one challenging sanction granted by then Governor M Fathima Beevi for prosecuting her in the wealth case.
Trial progresses. By august 2000, 250 prosecution witnesses examined, only 10 more remained.
In the 2001 May Assembly elections, AIADMK secures absolute majority and Jayalalitha becomes Chief Minister. Her appointment is challenged due to her conviction in October, 2000 in the TANSI (Tamil Nadu Small Industries Corporation) case. SC nullifies the appointment.
September 21, 2001: Jayalalithaa ceases to be Chief Minister.
After her conviction is set aside, Jayalalithaa is elected to the Assembly in a bypoll from Andipatti constituency on Feb 21, 2002, and again sworn in as Chief Minister.
Three public prosecutors resign as also senior counsel.
Several prosecution witnesses resile from their earlier depositions after AIADMK returned to power.
2003: DMK general secretary K Anbazhagan approaches Supreme Court for transferring the trial to Karnataka on the ground that a fair trial was not possible in Tamil Nadu with Jayalalithaa as Chief Minister.

On November 18, 2003: 
The Supreme Court transfered the case to Bangalore.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa was on Saturday sentenced to four years in prison after being convicted in an Rs 66-crore disproportionate assets case by a special sessions court in Bangalore. Three others were also convicted in case. Jayalalithaa, chief of the AIADMK, was also asked to pay a fine of Rs 100 crore. Her conviction has triggered massive protests across the state, with AIADMK workers targeting DMK supporters.
Here are the live updates on the story 28, september 2014:
07:48 pm: Jayalalithaa sent to Bangalore jail.
07:12 pm: Tamil Nadu CM Jayalalithaa taken into custody, to be taken to Bangalore central jail after medical check up
06:58 pm: Tamil Nadu Governor directs officers to ensure law and order is maintained in the state. To prevent any further untoward incident.
05:52 pm: Tension prevails as protesters burn effigies of DMK President M Karunanidhi, MK Stalin and MK Alagiri.
AIADMK workers tear DMK party posters in various places including in Chennai and Madurai.
pelt stones in Ambattur, salem, Cuddalore, Srirangam which is Jayalalithaa's assembly constituency.
Shops and commercial establishments down shutters in various parts of the state.
Protesters damage vehicles parked alongside roads.
05:30 pm: Theatres closed, Malls shut in Tamil Nadu.  Normal life disrupted. 
05:21 pm: Jayalalithaa ceases to be MLA and CM. Will go to jail tonight.
05:20 pm: Buses burnt near Ambattur, Kancheepuram, several injured. 
05:06 pm: Jayalalithaa goes to Bangalore jail.
05:05 pm: Jayalalithaa slapped with Rs 100-crore fine.
05:04 pm: Jayalalithaa to step down as Chief Minister.
05:03 pm: Automatically, Jaya gets dissqualified for six years
05:02 pm: Jaya and others including Sasikala get sentence in a special court
4:57 pm: Jaya gets four-year prison.  | Watch Video 
4. 56 pm: Jaya may face seven years of jail amid reports of aresst.   
4.55 pm: Quantum of sentence to be delivered in Jaya assets case. 
04:00 pm: Jayalalithaa has been found guilty along with three others in 18-year-old dispropotionate assets case.    
3:25 pm: Tense situation in Tamil Nadu. Clashes erupt between DMK and AIADMK in various parts of Chennai
2:10 pm: The judgment in Jayalalithaa's DA case adjourned till 3pm
1:48 pm: Security beefed up at DMK office, leaders' houses.
1:44 pm: Celebrations break out outside DMK chief Karunanidhi's Gopalapuram residence in Chennai.

11:40 am: Chaos reigns near the court as supporters of Jayalalithaa lathicharged.
11:32 am: John Michael D'Cunha will read judgement. Prosecution and defence lawyers inside the court, along with all accused.
11:29 am: Four BSF companies have been deployed at the special court to manage the crowd. AIADMK supporters have been asked to keep away from the court premises. Many Tamil Nadu ministers among them.
10:58 am: There are four accused in the case. Jayalalithaa, Sasikala and Ilavarasi arrived together in the same convoy while the fourth accused VN Sudhakaran had arrived earlier.
10:42 am: Tamil Nadu chief minister Jayalalitha reaches special court in Bangalore
After an 18-year court battle, special Judge John Michael Cunha John Michael Cunha convicted 66-year old Jayalalithaa, who is general secretary of the AIADMK.
He held Jayalalithaa and three others - Sasikala and her relatives V.N. Sudhakaran and J. Illavarasi guilty. Sasikala is the close aide of Jayalalithaa.
Pronouncing the order, the special Judge held Jayalalithaa guilty of amassing wealth disproportionate to known sources of her income under Sections 109 and 120 (b) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, said Special Public Prosecutor G. Bhavani Singh. Her aide Sasikala and two others have also been convicted. 
"The quantum of sentence will be decided by the judge later, which can range from two to seven years," Singh added.
Senior BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, who had filed a petition in 1996 against her, told senior Headlines Today jounalist, Jayalalithaa, who had the best lawyers, "should know corruption doesn't pay". "The judge is very upright. We are fighting against corruption," he said. CPI leader D. Raja told Headlines Today that Jayalalithaa will have to "step down". He added though that there was no immediate threat to the government, it has to be seen who is going to be nominated the next leader. Organisation Secretary of DMK T.K.S. Elangovan said "justice was delayed, not denied".   
Earlier, there was media blackout in many parts of Tamil Nadu, while there was a power cut in many parts of Chennai.
As the charges were being read against all the accused, unprecedented security was put up around the DMK ministers' residences in Chennai. Jayalalithaa's supporters burnt the posters of DMK leaders and Swamy. The Tamil Nadu chief minister on Tuesday had filed two more defamation cases against Swamy for his comments on Twitter ridiculing her.     
Reports said her supporters clashed with cops even as they were shown distributing sweets in anticipation of a win in the favour of their leader.  
Amid palpable tension, the 65-year-old AIADMK chief set out from her Poes Garden residence in Chennai at 8.40 am towards the airport along with her close aide Sasikala Natarajan, another accused in the case, besides Ilavarasi and flew to Bangalore in a special aircraft. See Pictures
The three other accused are Jayalalithaa's associate V.K. Sasikala, Sasikala's nephew V. N. Sudhakaran and sister-in-law J. Illavarasi.
Special Court Judge Michael Dicunha will be delivering the verdict soon at the makeshift court created at Bangalore central prison at Parappana Agrahara on the outskirts of Bangalore city, which has been provided with multi-layer security cover.
The Bangalore city police have promulgated prohibitory orders under Section 144 of CrPC as a precautionary measure ahead of the court delivering its verdict.
The case was transferred to Bangalore's Special Court in 2003 by the Supreme Court on a petition filed by DMK leader K. Anbazhagan, who had expressed doubts over conduct of fair trial in Tamil Nadu as Jayalalithaa ruled the state then.
"We have deployed about 2,000 security personnel in and around the central jail and about 5,000 additional forces have been positioned across the city to maintain law and order and ensure peace," Additional Commissioner of Police Alok Kumar said.
Police have also installed CCTV cameras at vantage points in the area to check movement of people and vehicles towards the jail.
As a precautionary measure, inter-state bus services between Bangalore and Hosur across the border in Tamil Nadu have been suspended since 6am till late afternoon.
THE GENESIS AND THE AFTERMATH
During her first tenure (1991-1996) as the chief minister, Jayalalithaa had announced that she would take just Re.1 as her salary.
The charge against her was that her assets were around Rs 3 crore in 1991 and had grown to around Rs 66 crore between 1991-1996.
The AIADMK was voted out in 1996 as it was perceived to be corrupt.
Incidentally, DMK MP T.M. Selvaganapathy lost his Rajya Sabha seat this year after he was convicted in the cremation shed case by a CBI court. He was the local administration minister in Jayalalithaa's government when the scam broke. He later switched sides to the DMK.
The disproportionate assets case filed in 1996 by the then DMK government led by M. Karunanidhi saw several twists and turns during its course.
When the AIADMK returned to power in 2001 several witnesses turned hostile. On a petition filed by DMK leader K. Anbazhagan in the apex court, the case was transferred to Bangalore from Chennai.
Since then, the case meandered, with several petitions filed by the defence and several adjournments.
Over 255 prosecution witnesses and over 95 defence witnesses have been heard in the case.
Jayalalithaa was also summoned by the trial court in 2011 and answered over 1,300 questions posed to her by the judge.
This is not the first time in her political career that Jayalalithaa has been convicted by a court. In 2000, a trial court sentenced Jayalalithaa for three years and two years imprisonment in two cases.
The big question now is who will head the government in the absence of Jayalalithaa. Again this is not the first time such a question has cropped up.
In 2001, Jayalalithaa had to step down as a chief minister following a Supreme Court verdict which held that she cannot hold the office after being convicted for criminal offences.
However, she made O. Panneerselvam, a senior minister in her government, as the chief minister.
In 2002, Jayalalithaa again became the chief minister after being acquitted by the Madras High Court. She was later elected from Andipatti constituency.
AIADMK leaders do not rule out re-run of such an arrangement.
Friends and foes are in awe of Jayalalithaa, who is the tallest Brahmin politician in a state where anti-Brahminism is a part of political discourse.
Even her critics admit that Jayalalithaa is a fighter and has an iron grip over her party.
The judgment against her was delivered in a state where she was born.
Born in what was then known as Mysore on Feb 2, 1948, Jayalalithaa moved to Chennai with her mother, who started acting in movies.
Jayalalithaa studied at the Bishop Cotton Girl's High School in Bangalore and another Christian convent, Church Park, in Chennai. A bright student, Jayalalithaa ventured into acting and made her debut at the age of 16 in a Kannada movie.
Her first Tamil movie was the memorable "Vennira Aadai". But it was the grand success of "Aayirathil Oruvan" pairing with the legendary M.G. Ramachandran (MGR) that turned Jayalalithaa into a leading light of Tamil movie world.
She has paired with almost all the leading Tamil heroes. She has acted in over 100 movies, mostly in Tamil, Telugu and Kannada.
A charismatic leader who is at home in Tamil, English and Hindi (a rare quality in Tamil Nadu politics), Jayalalithaa has also sung many songs and written several stories. But when she entered politics, few could have predicted her meteoric rise.
AIADMK founder-leader MGR made Jayalalithaa the party's propaganda secretary in the early 1980s. In 1984, she entered the Rajya Sabha.
Jayalalithaa, who chose never to marry, was elected to the Tamil Nadu assembly for the first time in 1989. Just two years later, she became the chief minister, sweeping the election of 1991 held in the wake of former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi's assassination.
She lost her huge mandate within five years amid corruption charges. 

Bharat Nirmaan by scam, corruption

This image depicting, that scam, corruption is not stopping it's growing on. This cartoon is maded by manjul.
The copyright is reserved to owner of image.

SOURCES : WWW.MANJUL.COM

UPA Prime minister please resign you are a part of corruption scams.

This is really a funny cartoon. In this People of other political party asking Dr. Manmohan singh to resign from Prime minister post when he was prime minister from 2004 till 2014 may. But Sonia Gandhi, President of National Congress maded Dr. Manmohan singh to never mind and keep going . As he was always being silent . This cartoon is maded by manjul .

SOURCES: WWW.MANJUL.COM

THE Rs 23,000 crore 4G SCAM RELIANCE

After the 2G spectrum allocation scam of the UPA Government, another major telecom scandal in the allocation of 4G spectrum (BWA) has come to light by the recent CAG report. In fact, AAP leader and senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan has filed a PIL in the Supreme Court seeking cancellation of Reliance Industries’ telecom license and a through criminal investigation. Supreme Court had issued notice to Government and Reliance on that petition on 9th May 2014.
The factum of the scam is this. The UPA Government in March 2013 allowed a back-door entry of Reliance Jio Infocomm into voice telephony in violation of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the 2G case. This was done at the price discovered in 2001 of Rs 1,658 crores for a pan-India licence, which is the same price that was struck down by the Supreme Court in the 2G judgment because of having caused a huge loss to the public exchequer.
During May-June 2010 the auctions for 3G and 4G were concluded. The 3G auction fetched Rs 16,750.58 crore for 5+5 MHz spectrum in 2100 MHz (or 2.1 GHz) band. Thus, per MHz price worked out to be Rs 1,675 crore. Immediately, after the 3G auction, the 4G auction began which fetched Rs 12,847.77 crore for 20 MHz pan-India license in the 2300 MHz (or 2.3 GHz) band. This works out to be Rs 642.39 crore per MHz. This was so because all documents stated that 4G spectrum was for data services only, whereas 3G spectrum can be used for both data and voice telephony.
Infotel Broadband Services Pvt Ltd (IBSPL) emerged as the only company to have acquired pan-India 4G spectrum. IBSPL had an internet license since November 2007 and had just one subscriber with revenue of Rs 16.28 lakhs during 2009-10, and its authorized share capital was Rs 3 crore and the paid up capital was Rs 2.51 crore. Infotel Digicomm Pvt Ltd (IDPL) held 99.99% share of the IBSPL at the time of submission of application in March 2010.
Within hours of completion of 4G auction on 11.06.2010, IBSPL increased the authorised share capital from Rs 3 crore to Rs 6,000 crore. On 17.06.2010, the company authorized its Board of Directors to allot 475 crore equity share of Rs 10 each to Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) and 25 crore equity share of Rs 10 to Infotech Digicomm Pvt Ltd (IDPL) aggregating to the equity capital of Rs 5,000 crore. On the same day, the company also decided to change from a private company to Public Limited Company (Infotel Broadband Services Ltd). Thus, the company within a week of winning the 4G spectrum disposed off 95% shares to RIL while 5% was retained by IDPL. Much later in March 2013, the company was renamed as Reliance Jio Infocomm Pvt Ltd.
CAG has found that the Government did not protect its interest at the time of framing eligibility criteria for the 4G auction. It allowed participation of internet (ISP) licensees without ensuring adequate safeguards in terms of net-worth of the companies participating in the auction. It found that while a UAS licensee or even a new company without a license was allowed to participate in the 4G auction, but they had to pass through the test of net-worth in order to become eligible, but no such criteria was specified for the existing internet (ISP) licensees participating in 4G auction. CAG observed that this criterion was important even for ISP-A licensees as they had to participate in the bidding where the reserve price was fixed at Rs 1,750 crore per pan-India license for 20 MHz spectrum in 2.3 GHz band. The only company which won the pan-India 4G license, was an ISP-A licensee, Infotel Broadband Services Pvt Ltd (IBSPL), a HFCL promoted group company. CAG has stated that IBSPL was given the ISP-A license in November 2007, and it had just one leased-line subscribers as on December 2009 and total revenue of just Rs 16.28 lakh for FY 2009-10. The paid-up capital was just Rs 2.51 crore and 99.99 per cent of it was held by Infotel Digicom Pvt Ltd at the time of submission of application for the 4G auction in March 2010. Thus, this company could not be termed as a serious player. And there were no checks in-built in the auction process to eliminate such non-serious players, CAG has observed.
After the company was taken over Reliance Industries, the Government allowed it to provide voice telephony (which was earlier prohibited) without conducting a fresh auction. This was done at the rate of Rs 1,658 crore which was fixed in 2001, and had been struck down by the Supreme Court in the 2G case for causing huge loss to public exchequer. The CAG has now concluded that besides vitiating the auction process, an undue advantage of Rs 22,842 crore was given to RIL at the cost of exchequer. The relevant part of the CAG’s report is reproduced below: -
It was found that the basis of the decision i.e. payment of entry fee of Rs 1,658 crore by ISP licensee for a permission to Pan India provision of mobile voice services using BWA spectrum considered by the DoT Committee, Telecom Commission and the MOC&IT, was primarily intended to fill the gap between the eligibility criterion stipulated for participation in the 3G / BWA auction in 2010 as UAS / CMTS licensees had paid entry fee of Rs 1,658 crore while ISP licensees had paid only Rs 30 lakh.
The DoT Committee, Telecom Commission and the MOC&IT however ignored the fact that the quantum of entry fee i.e. Rs 1,658 crore was basically discovered in 2001 through the bidding for the 4th Cellular licenses. Market conditions since then have changed drastically, and this price needed to be modified to reflect the present value. Neither the DoT Committee / TC under the Chairmanship of the Secretary DoT nor the MOC&IT felt the need for revision of the price discovered in 2001 as the entry fee for UASL in 2013, even when the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India had cancelled 122 licenses granted in 2008 on the basis of the same entry fee stating that it was impossible for them to approve the action of the DoT.
Therefore, by permitting ISPs to provide mobile voice service using BWA spectrum won in 2010 auction post-auction, the government has brought ISP licensees with BWA spectrum at par with UAS / CMTS 3G spectrum winners so far as provision of services are concerned – Voice, Data, etc., and post auction interpretation of such vital nature would appear to be arbitrary, inconsistent and not appropriate. Hence, IBSPL, now Reliance JioInfocomm, appeared to have been accorded undue advantage of Rs 22,842 crore i.e. the difference of the proportionate prices for 20 MHz block size in 2.1 GHz spectrum band (3G spectrum) and 2.3 GHz spectrum band (BWA spectrum) plus the Net Present Value of the entry fee for UASL at the end of FY 2009-10 (Rs 20,653 crore plus Rs 3,847 crore - Rs 1,658 crore). Besides, the sanctity of the entire auction process has been rendered vitiated due to post auction interpretations and interventions after three years. It was therefore no surprise that Reliance JioInfocomm was among the first group of companies which applied for UL immediately after introduction of the scheme and obtained the Letter of Intent (LoI). Had the spectrum blocks been specified and declared as liberalised spectrum blocks i.e. open for all technology / services in the NIA in February 2010, there was no doubt that bidders would have taken informed decision for putting up their bid and the market discovered price would have been significantly different for 3G and BWA spectrum.
SOURCES  : www.aamaadmiparty.org

PACL being probed for various violations

Income tax search yielded Rs 200 crore of ' additional income' in June 2013
For seven years, Vijaybhanu Yadav, a mechanic at MTNL in Mumbai, deposited Rs 1,000 every six months in a scheme of PACL, a Pearls group entity. "Maturity poori ho gayi December mein; abhi tak paisa nahi mila (the scheme matured in December; I haven' t received the money yet)," Yadav said by phone. He added through the past eight months, he had been running from pillar to post to recover the maturity amount of Rs 24,000.

Yadav had invested through an agent, who had returned to his native Jaunpur in Uttar Pradesh, citing illness. "Agent bhi UP wale, investor bhi UP wale zyaada the (both agents and investors were largely from UP)," Yadav said.

Like Yadav, 58.5 million investors in the company are stuck, with PACL freezing payments. Following the Central Bureau of Investigation registering a preliminary inquiry against PACL and its brass, including founder Nirmal Singh Bhangoo, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) last week ordered the company to refund the Rs 49,100 crore it had collected, claiming the collection was illegal.

Sebi' s refund order, it seems, is the latest in a long line of battles PACL is fighting. An analysis of the company' s annual report by Business Standard showed PACL was under investigation by the Income Tax Department and the Registrar of Companies. Also, its agents were cheating it of thousands of crores, leading to litigation. It had also declared in the case of some workers, it hadn' t complied with the PF and ESI Act provisions.

Two detailed questionnaires to the company, sent on Saturday and Monday, didn' t elicit any response. Subrata Bhattacharya, director of PACL and one of those named in the Sebi order, said he didn' t want to add anything to the company' s official statement.

In its statement, PACL had said it wasn' t running a collective investment scheme, as claimed by Sebi, adding it would move the Securities Appellate Tribunal against the Sebi order. "We assure our customers their investments are safe and their interests will not be jeopardised," it said.

It added it had "sufficient asset holdings vis-a-vis the money raised for its real estate business". One of the first qualifications by the auditor in the balance sheet for year ended March 2013 was on the huge sums given by the company as advances to its agents for purchase of land. On several instances, these agents didn' t procure the land and didn' t return the money, leading to legal proceedings. "The company has advanced a sum of Rs 1,753,58,76,071 (Rs 1,753 crore) to various parties for procurement of land on the basis of agreements/MoUs (memoranda of understanding) entered into by the company with such parties. Since the parties to agreements/MoUs had not procured land against the advances made and/or did not refund the unadjusted advances, the company initiated legal actions/proceedings," the auditor said.

In June 2013, the Income Tax Department conducted searches at various company offices. "Pursuant to such operations and based on the statements of directors, recorded during search/post-search proceedings, the company has recognised additional income of Rs 200,00,00,000 (Rs 200 crore) in the financial statements, with a corresponding debit to the receivable business assets account, of the total sum of Rs 275,00,00,000 disclosed as additional income," it said.

The auditor said adjustments made by the company in its accounts weren' t in compliance with accounting standards. "In accordance with accounting standard-4, contingencies and events occurring after the balance sheet date, adjustment to assets and liabilities are required for events occurring after the balance sheet date that provide additional information, materially affecting the determination of the amount relating to conditions existing on the balance sheet date. Thus, the recognition of additional income of Rs 200,00,00,000 in the financial statements is not appropriate, as the event does not relate to the conditions existing on the balance sheet date." It added the accounting treatment, in terms of disclosure of additional income given by the company in the financial statements, wasn' t in accordance with accounting standard-4.

The company said, "The Registrar of Companies, Delhi and Haryana, has further initiated the inspection of books of accounts and other statutory records of the company, under section 209A of the Companies Act, 1956, for the last three years."

The company' s annual report suggested it had filed several compounding applications. "All the compounding applications have been successfully compounded by Company Law Board and the regional director with respect to the inspection conducted by the Department of Corporate Affairs. As on date, no application is pending on the part of the company."

The auditor said, "During the year under review, the company failed to deduct and contribute the equivalent sum of PF and ESI from the wages paid to certain temporary workers at development sites, resulting in non-compliance of the provisions of the relevant Act."

The company' s financial statements reflected a slump in its prospects. On a standalone basis, revenue from operations for 2012-13 was Rs 6,141.42 crore, compared with Rs 15,661.71 crore in the previous year. The company incurred a loss of Rs 98.32 crore before taxes, against a profit of Rs 234.7 crore in the previous year.

UNDER SCANNER

    58.5 mn Number of people stuck as PACL froze payments because of a multi-agency probe
     
    Rs 49,100 cr Refund ordered by Sebi to the firm, claiming alleged illegal collections
     
    One of the first qualifications by the auditor in the balance sheet for year ending March 2013 was on the huge sums given out by the company as advances to its agents for purchase of land.

SOURCES :www.business-standard.com

Fraud Case Opened against MMM-2011 Ponzi Scheme

7 June, 2012: A criminal case has been opened into the MMM-2011 Ponzi scheme on fraud charges, the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office said on Thursday.
The Federal Antimonopoly Service has come to the conclusion that “the MMM-2011 scheme is a financial pyramid,” the PGO said in a statement.
MMM-2011 (the three letters stand for "We Can Do a Lot" in Russia), founded by Sergei Mavrodi, uses the WebMoney online payment system to allow investors to buy tickets which work like shares, but have no real value. The project's mastermind has promised investors returns of 20-30 percent per month.
Lithuanian law enforcement agencies have halted operations of the MMM-2011 pyramid scheme after finding its activities violate laws, the local Delfi news portal reported late on Wednesday quoting law enforcement officials.
Amid rumors about the collapse of MMM-2011, Mavrodi announced last week he would create the MMM-2012.
A former mathematician, Mavrodi was released from prison in 2007 after serving a sentence for offenses relating to the collapse of the original MMM. He described the new project as a “financial social network.”
While his 1994 scheme used an aggressive TV and radio advertising campaign to attract investors, the new project relies solely on the Internet, a move which many see as a bid to attract Russia’s technologically-savvy youth.
Mavrodi’s 1994 swindle, which came to be regarded as a symbol of the lawlessness of the chaotic 1990s in Russia, was one of the largest among hundreds of other such schemes in that era. The pyramid schemes took advantage of the ignorance of a nation still learning the basics of a new capitalist system. Ponzi schemes became so commonplace that their prices were quoted on the front pages of newspapers.
According to estimates, the MMM scam attracted between two and five million investors, including a number of high-profile celebrities, who lost around $1.5 billion when it collapsed.
SOURCES: RIA Novosti

LIC housing loan scam

The 2010 fake housing loan in India was uncovered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in India. CBI arrested eight top-ranking officials of public sector banks and financial institutions, including the LIC Housing Finance CEO Ramchandran Nair, in connection with the scam.

CBI investigations

 CBI alleged that the officers of various public sector banks and financial institutions received bribes from a private financial services company, which acted as a mediator for corporate loans and other facilities from financial institutions. The bank officials sanctioned large-scale corporate loans to realty developers, overriding mandatory conditions for such approvals along with other irregularities.
The Central Bureau of investigation arrested number of high official from the several financial institutes in India in connection with the housing scam in November 24, 2010. Smith (2010) stated that findings are shocking where the head officers of several banks and financial institutes are involved in corporate corruption. Precisely, the banks and financial officials were from the public sectors including LIC, Bank of India, Central Bank of India and Punjab National Bank. However, ) stated that since the matter was related to the erosion of funds from the LIC housing and Finance Limited, event was named as the LIC housing and Finance Scandal. Lamont (2010) cited that the officers from the high rank including the secretary of LIC Investment, general managers, directors and deputy managers of banks were involved in taking out the funds from LIC in appropriate and unethical way. Smith (2010) said that these officials were acting as the middleman to provide the funds to the main parties and in return they were having hefty amount of funds from the real investors, insurers and other consumers. Smith (2010) regarded this as the distortion of the corporate governance system where the business ethics were neglected to sustain the core business activities of the public sector banking firm. Meanwhile, Economic Times stated that the officials were charged with the exploiting of funds, looting, corrupting corporate loan process and manipulating and overriding with the regulations of the LIC Housing and Finance Limited in regard to the approvals and other rules and regulations. Nonetheless, The loans provided through this manner were estimated to be worth of 85 Billion Dollars, comes as the biggest scandal in the Housing Finance in Asia However, the stock price took a sharp dip soon after the event. Apparently, LICHF had a good run till September 2010 when it reached Rs.299 and the growth rate undoubtedly, received the appreciation by the investors and other shareholders. The stock recorded no significant changes thereafter but the appearance of corporate scandal shook the stock price chart and the price dip to Rupees 150 by the end of year 2010. At present the stock price is stands at around rupees 190 and gaining its momentum over a period of time but however, Lamont (2010) felt that the combination of factors that happened in the last quarter of FY10 were accountable for the sharp decline in the LIC Housing and Finance Share price. Reuters stated that LIC Housing and Finance is looking forward to raise the capital to the tune of Rupees 25000 Crores in 2011-12 through debt. Eventually, the technical experts believed that company is developing its core competencies and capabilities and undoubtedly, investors would revive the stock price and current Market changes and company’s development will be seen through the price momentum. However, experts believed that the Housing and Finance Scandals by the top officials in LIC and other banking institutes will always stand to harm the future potential of such companies but however, the future and the endless opportunities lies in the hand of ultimate investors. Eventually, Online newspaper, Rediff quoted as saying that most of the brokers are taking up the stock of LICHF after the scam as related to the current project being performed by the company. Namely, IIFL, Aditya Birla, IL&FS are impressed by the current progress by the company and building up the stock ay higher rate. However, Reuters stated that the Financial Budget introduced by the Indian Planning Commission had slightly adverse effects on the stock of banking, insurance, mortgages and other related sector in the industries. However, the company has been quoted as saying that they would include the margin between 2.8 to 3% in relation to the rising interest rates and their effects on the share price. However, In response the scam, the Reserve Bank of India and other regulatory and financial bodies attempted to reform the housing finance sector by making several supervision and security measures in this regard. Eventually, the corporate scam destroyed the interest and confidence of investors and thus, the monetary and regulatory authorities must execute their task in relation to safeguarding the interests of investors. Apparently, Smith (2010) stated that the Central Bureau of Investigation exposed the stock price dip to 18% of the prevailing market rate after the scam and other banks who were involved saw a decline between 5 to 15% during the time. Hence, it was anticipated that investors believed in the core values and company’s relation with the investors and the stock changes occur in the short span of time however, the stock is futuristic for the long term.
CBI's Economic Offences Wing (EOW) raided offices of the public sector banks and LIC Housing Finance in six cities (Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai, Jaipur, Kolkata and Jalandhar), to recover incriminating documents.
According to CBI, the companies to which the loans in question were given include:
  • Lavasa Corp., a unit of Hindustan Construction Co.
  • Oberoi Realty Ltd.
  • Ashapura Minechem Ltd.
  • Suzlon Energy Ltd.
  • DB Realty Ltd., a part of the Dynamix Balwas Group
  • Emaar MGF Land Ltd.
  • Mantri Realty
  • Kumar Developers Ltd.
The CBI EOW also suspected that the companies may have inflated their assets value and balance sheets in order to make themselves eligible for the loans.
According to CBI, an employee of the financial services firm had expressed his willingness to turn witness in the case

Reactions

Most firms, including BGR Energy and Oberoi Realty denied any role in the scam.
The scam was discovered shortly after the 2010 Commonwealth Games corruption controversy and the Adarsh Housing Society Mumbai scam. The investors were rattled as news of the arrests broke in Mumbai. The share of the LIC Housing Finance, Central Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Bank of India as well as other banking and real-estate stock declined.
The Union finance ministry initially claimed that the case was a bribery incident, and not a large-scale scam. The CBI officials had indicated that the size of the scandal could be worth over Rs 1,000 crore, but the finance ministry officials claimed that the magnitude of the scandal was too insignificant to have an impact on the Indian financial sector.
The income-tax (IT) department decided to investigate the books of those involved in the scam, after receiving primary reports from CBI. However, many political analysts believe innocent bankers were implicated in this falsely created scam to defuse attention of the common man against the much larger and serious scams done by the ruling Indian government, notably of corrupt politicians like CWG minister Suresh Kalmadi and ex-telecom minister A Raja.

SOURCES :  
  •  Wikipedia
  • PTI

NTRO scam – INR8 billion

Apex court gives solicitor general a month to file report; issues notices to NTRO, CVC and CAG.
Flabbergasted at the Centre’s inertia in concealing yet another scandal in the protected National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO) that deals with various high-tech defence equipment, the Supreme Court on Tuesday sought a status report and a one-man inquiry report that established the grave charge of massive meddling with the public money by the security agency under the PMO.During a brief hearing in a law suit filed by a whistleblower VK Mittal, who resigned as a senior scientist of NTRO and perused initiatives to unmask the officers behind the Rs800-crore scandals, the apex court also issued notices to the Central Vigilance Commission, Comptroller and Accountant General (CAG) and NTRO.
Expressing its dissatisfaction over the manner in which the Delhi high court disposed of Mittal’s law suit ‘which is very crucial and important’, a bench of Justices RV Raveendran and AK Patnaik have given one month to solicitor general Rohington Nariman to submit the inquiry report and the status report in a sealed cover.
NTRO was created by the Central government in 2004 under Prime Minister Office to deal with missile monitoring, satellite and airborne imagery, cyber patrolling and security, cyber offensive operations, communication support systems and cryptology.
Mittal’s petition argued by Jayant Bhushan, the son of Shanti Bhushan, said that the NTRO since the financial year 2005 has been allotted about Rs8,000 crore. Since the agency describes itself as the `secret service’, its accounts have been without any detailed CAG audit.
Out of total funding, 25% or Rs2,000 crore, is said to be Secret Service Fund (SSF) of which there is no accounting.
In response to a RTI query, the Director General of Audit said a government memorandum stipulates that “the accounts of secret service expenditure will not be subjected to scrutiny by the audit authority”.
Bhushan said the public money, though used for the national security service, couldn’t be left for misappropriation.
Mittal’s law suit said the inquiries conducted in NTRO transactions, established that almost all the allegations levelled by him on corruption, irregularities in procurement of equipment and recruitments have been found to be correct. All the efforts have been made by the government “to suppress these inquire reports”.
It was national security adviser Shiv Sankar Menon who had ordered an inquiry into corruption in the NTRO.

Sources say the CAG audit found security lapses in laying down specifications for procurement. The audit has also noticed possible misuse of secret funds but these funds are out of its purview. In fact, Rai had to request then National Security Advisor (NSA) M.K. Narayanan for permission for the "special audit". The NTRO reports directly to the NSA. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh gave the final go-ahead. The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) had received a spate of complaints about the functioning of the NTRO with reference to the purchase of expensive, substandard equipment, including a satellite communication terminal, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and equipment needed for cyber monitoring. After a rigorous audit that has taken a year, the CAG has found several anomalies in the procurement of equipment. It found the NTRO was routinely misrepresenting projects. The chairman of NTRO is authorised to sanction projects worth Rs.20 crore. For any sum more than that, sanction from the PMO and the Cabinet is required.
Sources say bigger projects were broken into smaller ones, all requiring less than Rs.20 crore each. For example, while purchasing satellite monitoring equipment for Thuraya phones in 2007-08, the NTRO drew up an estimate of Rs.52 crore. Instead of going to the pmo for approval, it broke up the project into three smaller ones-two monitoring sets, each worth Rs.20 crore, and one Rs.12-crore expansion set.
The CAG found several irregularities in the UAV project valued at Rs.300 crore in 2007-08. It did not call a tender and negotiated directly with the Israel Aerospace Industries. The NTRO also failed to foresee the requirement for a ground-operated Electronic Intelligence (ElInt) System. Later, instead of seeking approval from the Cabinet, the NTRO chairman personally approved the Rs.20 crore ElInt system, and then merged it with the UAV project.
In a case of serious security violation, the intelligence agency ignored a mandatory check in the purchase of an encryption system for its mobile satellite communication system, Sampark. Any encryption system has to be first approved by the DRDO's Scientific Analysis Group (SAG), the country's only crypto evaluation lab. The NTRO purchased the Rs.20-crore equipment without the SAG check in 2008. Later, when the air force was looking for an encryption system, it went to SAG with the same system and it was rejected because it had several Chinese parts, a potential security threat. The system was banned but the NTRO had already used it for seven months.
In another major violation in the purchase of a satellite communication terminal, NTRO laid down specifications that suited only one company, Singapore Technologies (ST). So, all the four bidders-BEL, ECIL, ITI and Ericom-quoted st. By the time tenders were opened, the Government had blacklisted ST. NTRO then went into an overdrive and finalised negotiations in an unprecedented 48 hours to beat the actual notification of the blacklisting. The tender was eventually withdrawn.
According to established practice, intelligence agencies are subjected only to an internal audit conducted by an official of the Audit and Accounts Service, posted in the particular intelligence organisation as a representative of CAG. The reports are kept secret and only discussed internally. Only an intimation of the audit having been carried out is sent to the CAG.
Set up in 2004, on the recommendation of the Kargil Review Committee, the NTRO has an annual budget of Rs.750 crore. Since its inception, it has received continuous flak for its poor performance and failure to provide any meaningful and actionable intelligence. The agency has failed to recruit people qualified to carry out its mandate. "The Government does not have such experts. The work requires high-value experts who will always be paid much higher in the private sector,'' an official explained. Several retired IPS officers, Intelligence Bureau and R&AW sleuths have been hired to fill up posts. There were some scientists, including former NTRO chief KVSS Prasad Rao.
There are demands to close down the NTRO but that is not an option the PMO is considering. NSA Shivshankar Menon has been trying to get the organisation back on track. "More than Rs.2,000 crore has been spent on its equipment since it was set up. There definitely is some potential which can be exploited,'' says a PMO official.
Not Adding UpNTRO misrepresented facts in a bid to eliminate a mandatory process
Against the law
Rs.300 crore:
Bought UAVs from Israel without calling a tender
Splitting it up
Rs.39 crore:
Used for setting up a UAVairfield near Dehradun.The cost was divided into Rs.20 crore and Rs.19 crore to avoid getting approval from PMO, mandatory for any project above Rs.20 crore.
Irregular approach
Rs.52 crore:
For purchasing satellite monitoring equipment.Broke project into three smaller ones to avoid mandatory PMO permission.
Violating security
Rs.20 crore:
Purchased encryption system for its mobile satellite communication system without DRDO approval. The system was banned because it contained Chinese parts.

SOURCES : INDIA TODAY

Goa mining scam

Panaji, Oct 7, 2011 :Accused of sitting on a Rs.3,500 crore illegal mining scam, the Goa government Friday got a major reprieve after the speaker refused to table the damning Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report in the assembly, the last day of the monsoon session.
A furious opposition walked out of the house after Speaker Pratapsing Rane refused to heed its demand of tabling the PAC report, which points a finger at Chief Minister Digambar Kamat, who has been Goa's minister of mines for over a decade. The report, however, does not specifically name Kamat.

PAC chief and Leader of Opposition Manohar Parrikar said that it was not within the powers of the speaker to hold back a PAC report, which had been submitted by him Wednesday.

"You do not want to table the report. We are walking out because we do not want to be a part of any illegality," Parrikar said.

He later accused the speaker of acting in league with the government and said nearly "seventy-five percent of Congress legislators were involved in illegal mining".

"The speaker is in league with the government. I have no hesitation in saying that he is trying to protect someone," Parrikar told reporters.

Refusing to table the report, Rane said: "It is my duty to scrutinise the report. If it is not proper, according to the rules, such reports cannot be laid. They should be programmed. I have to go through the report."

Four legislators of the ruling Congress-Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) alliance out of the seven-member PAC had not signed the report, Rane said.

The four had refused to sign the report Tuesday saying they needed time to study the document, which severely indicts the government.

The PAC report charges several state government agencies with turning a blind eye to illegal mining in Goa. These include the department of mines, the pollution control board, the forest department and the police, besides central government agencies like the ministry of environment and forests, the Indian Bureau of Mines and the director general of mines safety.

Addressing the assembly Wednesday soon after submitting the report, Parrikar had obliquely laid the mantle of the illegal mining scam on Kamat's head.

"Does the chief minister not want to change the situation in the mines department at all? Does he not want to punish anyone guilty? Any third person would take inference that he (Kamat) is involved," Parrikar said.

"When he was the chief minister, exports rose from 16 tonnes to 54 tonnes...Production is thrice now. What is legally extracted is 30 million tonnes (of ore). It is perfectly legal, while 20 million tonnes is not legal," Parrikar had said.

Goa exported nearly 54 million tonnes of iron ore in the last fiscal, out of which nearly seven million tonnes is allegedly extracted illegally.

SOURCES : Deccanherald.com.

Mumbai Sales Tax fraud – INR10 billion

Mumbai: In what has the potential to rock the diamond market, the state sales tax department is probing diamond imports worth Rs 1,000 crore for tax evasion.
An investigation carried out by the department's vigilance wing has revealed that several importers based in Mumbai manipulated details, to evade tax payment on rough polished diamonds, imported from Dubai and Hong Kong. "At least 27 firms registered in Mumbai and operating from the diamond hub near Opera House are under the scanner following the discovery," a senior department official, requesting anonymity, said.

Raids conducted by Maharashtra Sales Tax department have unearthed tax evasion of Rs 1,000 crore, involving 1,150 hawala dealer and 37,000 beneficiaries. "The checks were carried over last six months and FIRs have been filed in several cases," sales tax commissioner Sanjay Bhatia said.
The official attributed the accomplishment to the computerisation of the department. Of the total amount, Rs 400 crore have already been collected and the process to collect the remaining amount is underway, Bhatia said.
The sales tax department formed a special cell called Economic Intelligence Unit three years ago. It looks into cases of dealers claiming false credits, hiding turnover, and even hawala transfers. Hawala entails making bogus invoices to allow a trader to claim tax credits. In this racket, the hawala operator, posing as the 'seller', exists only on paper and gets a cut in return.

Some beneficiaries had even dragged the department to the Bombay High Court challenging the provisions of VAT Act, but the transparency and handling of voluminous transactions with precise accuracy as a result of the IT initiative, led to the Court upholding the actions of the department, he said.
The department raided major beneficiaries who have evaded a huge quantum and also sent notices to around 37,000 dealers across the state, giving them an opportunity to make payment and escape actions like prosecution, another department official said.
Police complaints against 125 dealers have been filed before the special Economic Offence Wing of police assisting Sales Tax department at Vikrikar Bhavan, Mazgaon and around 25 FIRs have been filed, the official said.
More police complaints under Indian Penal Code against hawala operators and the beneficiaries are in the offing. The department is ahead of commercial tax departments across the country as far as computerisation and effective e-governance initiative is concerned, he said. The hawala dealers defrauded the state government of Rs 1,000 crore rvenue through incorrect VAT claim of input tax
credit by their beneficiaries, he said.
The list of 1150 dealers has been published on the department's website www.mahavat.gov.in, he said.
The Sales Tax department has asked traders to come forward and voluntarily deposit the revenue that has been defrauded and escape prosecution. The official pointed out that the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court had given 45-day police custody to a CA who aided these hawala dealers.
He pointed out that even the Income Tax department has used information from Sales Tax department to raise demands of income tax evaded due to use of hawala bills for either reducing profit by accounting bogus turnover of purchases or showing fake expenses.

SOURCES : Times Of India