New York Federal Judge Martin Thomas Manton was the first federal judge convicted of accepting bribes while in office in 1939

Martin Thomas Manton
Martin Thomas Manton was a United States federal judge in New York City, who resigned and served time in prison for accepting bribes while in office. In 1916 he was the youngest federal judge in the United States. Manton was the first federal judge to be convicted of bribery.
Manton suffered severe financial reverses during the Great Depression and began to accept gifts and loans from persons having business before his court, some of which constituted outright bribes for selling his vote in pending patent litigations. Rumors of corruption spread and in 1939, Manton resigned under pressure of investigations by Manhattan District Attorney Thomas E. Dewey, who wrote a letter to the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committeerecommending impeachment proceedings, and by a federal grand jury.
Following his resignation, Manton was indicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York where he once sat as a judge. The government was represented at trial by John T. Cahill, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Assistant United States Attorneys, Mathias F. Correa, Jerome Doyle, Frank H. Gordon and Silvio J. Mollo. Honorable William Calvin Chestnut of the District of Maryland presided over the jury trial at which Manton called former Democratic Presidential candidates Alfred Smith and John W. Davis as character witnesses. Manton became the first federal judge convicted of accepting bribes.
Manton's conviction was affirmed by a specially constituted Second Circuit panel consisting of retired Supreme Court JusticeGeorge Sutherland, Supreme Court JusticeHarlan Fiske Stone, and newly appointed Second Circuit Judge Charles Edward Clark.Manton was sentenced to two years inLewisburg Federal Penitentiary and served 17 months.
Following release from prison, he moved toFayetteville, New York, where he died on November 17, 1946. To this day, a park in Queens, NY bears Manton's name.
SOURCES : MEDIAWIKI

Inmate scams victim out of $46,000 from her jail cell

Bexar County Jail
Inmate scams victim out of $46,000 from her jail cell
SAN ANTONIO -- An investigation by KENS-TV has revealed an inmate at the Bexar County Jail convinced an employee to notarize multiple forged documents earlier this year.
Toni Stringfellow, 54, is currently awaiting trial for felony tampering with a governmental record and fraudulent possession of identifying information.
The Sheriff's Office acknowledged Monday that Toni Stringfellow signed another woman's name on several power of attorney forms, which were then notarized by a jail employee, in order to access the other woman's investment accounts.
According to paperwork obtained by KENS-TV, Toni Stringfellow was able to access $46,000 in an investment account belonging to Teresa Hudson Stringfellow.
Hudson Stringfellow told the Texas station's i-Team that in past interviews Toni Stringfellow has stolen her identity and committed other crimes against her, including stalking, since the early 1980's.
"What good does it do to have her behind bars if she can continue these forgeries and scams," said Hudson Stringfellow.
Sheriff Susan Pamerleau said Monday her office is now screening Toni's incoming and outgoing mail and restricting her use of the telephone.
Pamerleau declined to discuss if the employee was disciplined for not properly vetting the forms Toni signed.
"She made a mistake, we have corrected that, took appropriate action," said Sheriff Pamerleau.


Pamerleau added that non-uniform employees working at the jail have been retrained on how to deal with inmates they come in contact with.
Toni Stringfellow is scheduled to be sentenced next week as part of a plea deal.
She could be sentenced to 30 years in prison.
Court records show Toni Stringfellow served nearly nine years in prison from 2004 to 2013 for fraud, forgery and identity theft convictions.
SOURCES: USA TODAY NEWS

Saradha Scam: CBI Custody of Accused Debabrata Sarkar Extended by Three Days

File Photo: Saradha Group of Companies
Kolkata: A city court today sent top East Bengal Club official Debabrata Sarkar, an accused in the Saradha chit fund scam, to further three days' CBI custody while it remanded main accused Sudipta Sen to judicial custody till September 8.

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) Alipore Court sent Sarkar, who was arrested on August 20, to CBI custody for three more days following his six-day remand on a plea by the agency for further questioning.

Sudipto Sen, who had also been taken in custody by CBI for the second time for further questioning, was remanded to judicial custody till September eight.

Five others, who are also accused in the Saradha scam and were in judicial custody, had their judicial remand extended till September eight.

They are suspended Trinamool Congres Rajya Sabha MP Kunal Ghosh, Sen's close associate Debjani Mukherjee, senior Saradha Group officials Somnath Dutta, Arvind Chowhan and Manoj Negel.

CBI, on the directions of the Supreme Court, began its probe into the scam in which it has registered a number of cases in West Bengal and Odisha.

Sarkar is accused of conspiring with Saradha top brass in the alleged misappropriation of funds of the company.

CBI has formed a Special Investigating Team (SIT) headed by Joint Director Rajeev Singh to also probe the role of Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and RBI.

"Investigation conducted so far puts a question mark on the role of regulatory authorities like SEBI, Registrar of Companies and officials of RBI within whose respective jurisdictions and areas of operation the scam not only took birth but flourished unhindered," an apex court bench headed by Justice T S Thakur had said in its order. 

A team of ED officials quizzed the actor at his residence for close to two hours.

Gang jailed for stealing bank card details worth £16m

Vasile Pop, 30, one of the four people jailed over the fraud. Photograph: UK Cards Association/PA
Almost 1,000 bank accounts compromised by Harrow-based fraudsters in 'highly sophisticated' scheme

A gang of fraudsters have been jailed for between 21 and 64 months for stealing bank card details potentially worth up to £16m from more than 60,000 people in the UK and abroad.
Three men and a woman appeared at the Old Bailey in London for sentencing after pleading guilty to a string of fraud offences after police uncovered what they described as a "fraudster's utopia" in Harrow, Middlesex.
The prosecutor Catherine Pattison said the defendants – who were living at addresses in the area – were responsible for "a large-scale, highly sophisticated, well-executed ATM and counterfeit fraud".
The criminal operation was stopped in December last year when police seized an array of gadgets including cards traps, cloned cards and spy cameras in raids.
The gang from Romania were involved in three stages of fraud – stealing bank card data from cash machines, downloading it on to a computer and then copying the details on to counterfeit plastic cards, Pattison said.
In all, 953 bank accounts had been compromised and a total of £161,607.47 was taken, although the potential loss was far greater, she said.
Money was then transferred overseas to Panama, Romania, Italy and Colombia using MoneyGram and Western Union, the court was told.
The prosecutor said Florin Silaghi and Vasile Pop were the key players in the conspiracy, and Ovidiu Metac and his partner Adriana Turc had lesser roles.
They all pleaded guilty at earlier hearings to conspiracy to defraud between 1 January 2012 and 11 December 2013 and various other related offences.
Silaghi was jailed for 64 months, Pop for 61 months, Turc for 21 months and Metac for 43 months.
Jailing the four on Thursday, the recorder Douglas Day QC said: "Electronic card fraud is one of the scourges of the technological age both nationally and internationally. It causes significant loss to the banks and distress and inconvenience to the cardholders whose cards have been compromised."
Silaghi, 30, of Kenton Lane, Harrow, also admitted possessing criminal property relating to bank details, making a scanning device and possession of an identity document with improper intention.
Metac, 25, of Welldon Crescent, Harrow, pleaded guilty to having bank details on a computer, having counterfeit plastic cards, cash machine card slots and a fake photo identity card.
Turc, 27, also of Welldon Crescent, pleaded guilty to having bank account details on a computer and two counts relating to the transfer or acquisition of money.
Pop, 30, of Kenmore Road, Harrow, pleaded guilty to two counts of the transfer or acquisition of money.
Following the sentencing, police said 36,000 of the more than 60,000 card details found belonged to people in the UK.
Many of the cards found had the number of the stolen pin written in black marker pen on the back for easy use by the criminals, said a spokesman for the dedicated cheque and plastic crime unit (DCPCU), a specialist police unit.
The cards recovered had a street value of £16m based on the amount stolen on average from a compromised card, they said.
As officers investigated the case, evidence of a method never seen before in the UK to steal card details came to light – spy cameras fitted to the side panel of cash machines, rather than the top panel.
This method allowed fraudsters a better view of people's pin numbers when the keypad is only partially covered by the customer's hand.
DI Sarah Ward, who led the investigation for the DCPCU, said: "We are delighted that with these arrests and convictions we have been able to completely dismantle a criminal organisation that was stealing millions from people's bank accounts.
"The premises we raided really were a fraudster's utopia, with a dizzying array of machines and gadgets designed to commit serious fraud.
"These convictions send out a strong message to would-be fraudsters but there is also a word of caution for customers – always cover your pin closely with your hand when using a cash machine to beat the criminals."
Virgil Spiridon, director of the organised crime department at the Romanian national police, added: "Close co-operation between the DCPCU and our own officers played a key part in successfully securing these convictions.
"It was an excellent example of law enforcement agencies from different countries working together to ensure fraudsters' activities are brought to a halt and their crimes are punished."
Since the DCPCU was set up in April 2002, it has saved around £450m by clamping down on fraud activity.
SOURCES: www.theguardian.com

Scam victim who lost £80,000 set to take legal action against Santander

Bad move: scammers rely on calling the telephone number on back of a bank card. Photograph: Alamy
The bank is accused of failing in its duty of care as thousands are duped into moving their cash.


Santander stands accused of failing two customers who were duped by conmen to move their life savings into what they were told were new secure bank accounts – and is facing a possible legal action from one customer who has lost £80,000.
In recent months, Guardian Money has highlighted a particularly nasty scam that sees customers rung up by fraudsters who pretend to be phoning from the bank. They are first warned they've been the victim of a bank card fraud, and are then persuaded to move all their money to a new "secure" account set up by the bank – one that turns out to be the scammer's account.
Thousands of people have fallen for it – mostly because the victims are invited to call the telephone number on the back of their bank card, and therefore believe they are talking to their bank. The fraudsters rely on the UK's outdated phone system which allows the crooks to call you, and ask you to ring the bank's number. But when you dial it, the crooks have kept the line open by never putting the phone down at their end, and the call goes directly to them.
It also relies on a banking system flaw – the fact that money can be moved between UK accounts even if users put a completely different name on the transfer request.
Some older victims have lost life-changing sums – more than £100,000. However, victims are asking whether the financial regulators and banks have been negligent in not doing more to stop it going on, or to track the stolen money.
Sarah Moore was at home in February when she received a call from a man saying he was calling from Verified by Visa. He told her that her bank card was suspected of being used fraudulently. When asked which card, he said Santander, and suggested she call her bank using the number on her debit card.
Unhappy about calling the 0845 number, she used the SayNoto0870 website to find an 0800 number, heard a dial tone and the call was answered by a woman with a Scottish accent. All the time, the fraudsters had simply kept her line open. She was then subjected to a convincing tale of how her card had been used in several shops – being put on hold for several minutes at a time.
Eventually, she was told that the bank feared that the fraudster would try and make direct debit payments to a foreign account, and that she should move all her money to a secure account the bank had set up. As a result, she made several online payments to the account number and sort code she'd been given – totalling just over £80,000. In each case she put her own name in the transfer request – to what she thought was a Santander account, but was based at Lloyds.
When she rang Santander at 8am the follow morning (initially the bank's fraud department would not speak to her) it soon became clear what had happened. She says fraud staff knew all about the con, and even asked if the fraudster had a Scottish accent. As with previous cases, Santander has refused to refund her saying that she voluntarily handed her money over.
In an almost carbon copy case in January, Phillip Clark from Bath lost £20,000. He realised very quickly he had been conned and rang Santander 15 minutes after making the transfer to halt it. Despite this, the bank did not contact Barclays – host of the fraudulent account – for a further 12 hours, by which time all but £6,000 had gone.
Both he and Moore feel that Santander failed in its duty of care, and Moore is considering legal action to retrieve her money.
Clark took his cases to the Financial Ombudsman (FO) but it sided with Santander having decided the 12-hour delay was not a factor in him losing the cash. He is now bringing a second case against Barclays. The FO is still looking at Moore's case. * Names have been changed.
SOURCE: www.theguardian.com

TIN scam (2012)

The recent revelations about Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) scam have brought to fore that a few officials of the commercial tax department were involved in the wrongdoing.
The recent revelations about Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) scam have brought to fore that a few officials of the commercial tax department were involved in the wrongdoing.
As per an estimate by the commercial tax (enforcement) department, tax worth hundreds of thousands of crores of rupees has been evaded.
Commercial tax department additional commissioner Subodh Yadav said it is impossible that tax evasion of this scale could be carried out for years without the collusion of insiders. He said the department’s focus is on exposing the racket and bringing the accused to book.
Yadav said it is only after achieving this aim that the department would look into the role of insiders.
As the investigations continued, commercial tax sleuths cracked two more cases in KG Halli. They found that steel merchants were duping the government by avoiding tax approximately worth Rs1 crore.
Huzaifa Enterprises, owned by T Nisar Ahmed, was found to have carried out illegal transactions to the tune of Rs1.27 crore. MN Steels, owned by Vinod Seth, made illegal transactions to the tune of Rs6.6 crore; Rs34 lakh as tax are still due.
The investigation team found that although Seth owns MN Steel, he availed the TIN in the name of an employee, portraying him as the owner. While the employee drew a monthly salary of Rs21,000, Seth did business of more than `6.6 crore in the employee’s name, without paying tax.
How they do it
A senior police officer who is part of the investigation team said that like Seth, business-owners—in collusion with commercial tax officials—would avail TIN in the name of their employees, make moolah without paying tax and then escape as soon as they get a tip-off about a possible raid from their contact.
Another way businessmen evade tax is by stealing the TIN of petty businessmen to file tax returns and even to claim benefits.
The other trick is that businessmen enter the incorrect TIN thrice while filing returns online. The person’s TIN is blocked when the wrong number is entered thrice. Taking advantage of this, the businessmen would visit the nearest office of the commercial tax department and would get the confidential details of the TIN, which are then misused.
A senior official said only the master of the rules can bend the rules. He said that a few officials of the commercial tax department, who are aware of the nuances of the system, must have informed the wrong-doers about the ways to manipulate TIN.
The computerisation of tax procedures has helped the commercial tax department to unearth illegal business transactions worth several billions in the last few years.

The computerisation of tax procedures has helped the commercial tax department to unearth illegal business transactions worth several billions in the last few years.
But this fraud could have been exposed much early had the department conducted regular checks manually, a senior official said.
The data gathered through e-saral scheme exposed over 200 cases where businessmen obtained fake taxpayers’ identification number (TIN) and made business worth crores of rupees without paying tax to the department.
“Initially, we checked details of every suspicious TIN number based on which the department instructed the officials to conduct a detailed inspection,” said Subhod Yadav, additional commissioner of commercial tax.
Assistants commissioner of commercial tax, Hucche Gowda, filed a forgery and cheating complaint against Asadulla, owner of Neha Enterprises in DJ Halli.
Asadulla had obtained the TIN number in 2007 for his ‘hardware shop’ and data available with the department showed that he had transacted Rs23.3 crore business between 2007 and 2010.
However, when Asadulla had to pay tax arrears of Rs1.4 crore and was blacklisted, officials on inspection found that he had no shop in the given address.
According to Yadav, there are lakhs of businessmen in the state like Asadulla who avail TIN numbers to hoodwink tax officials.
SOURCES : Mediawiki

Haryana Forest Development Corporation Cash Scam

Chandigarh (I-Haryana News): Haryana Forest Development Corporation, a company formed by Government of Haryana in December 1989, which was initially formed with one of the objects to increase the financial status of farming and labour community by promoting development of forest based and allied industries, has now turned into milking cow to improve the financial health of Forests officers posted in this company, as this Haryana Government owned company does most of its business transactions in cash.

The copies of records with IHN establish that their officers are openly minting money by preparing fake and forged bills. In some cases, payment has been made against quotation/ estimates also, instead of proper bills from registered VAT/ Service Tax dealers. 


Following Table shows Cash transactions as compare to total expenditure incurred by corporation w.e.f 2009-2012:
Year
Total Expenditure in Lacs
Cash Expenditure in Lacs
2009-10
3098.36
1400
2010-11
3909.50
1100
2011-12
5008.60
1300
                                                                              Based on information atwww.hfdc.gov.in & ABCNIS Research
Intelligent Haryana News Research Team has found that more than 35 projects are being executed by HFDC Regional Office Gurgaon. Out the same, study of two projects based at Deolali at Nasik and Chandimandir at Panchkula, was done. It was analyzed that majority of projects bills were fabricated by HFDC Regional Office Gurgaon (copies of these are with IHN), which relate to arboriculture/ landscaping and Earth filling works.   All these two works were carried out by HFDC in Jurisdiction of Indian Army area.

The bills submitted by two Nasik based contractors, those who were shown aboriculture/ landscaping and worked in 2009 in Deolali (Nasik) in Cantonment area and paid cash of over Rs.22 lacs, all bills submitted by them do not have bill number, date and signature of contractors and apparently prepared in same handwriting and style which could raise eye brow of any layman on first sight.

The HFDC officers responsible to make payments to these dubious contractors while giving them cash payments of over Rs.22 lacs, ignoring Rs.20000/- limit as per Income Tax Act, also did not charged service tax on bills amount and further as work allotted to said contractors involved 60 labourers who were paid wage of Rs.448000/- without obeying the obligations under Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Act, 1952, which entails punishment of imprisonment of three years of defaulting employer (HFDC).

There are many bills on record, which are issued by those firms which never existed. In one of the Pinjore based contactor Mr. Shyam of S L Electrical, who was paid Rs.5.38 lacs, in cash for electrical work done in Chandimandir military area, the bills clearly indicate violation of VAT, Service Tax and Work Contract Tax provisions, which again mark a question on the validity of the said bills. When IHN talked to contactor Mr. Shyam, proprietor of so called S L Electrical Works over his mobile number and he fully expressed his ignorance regarding bill submitted and confirmed that he does not has shop at address mentioned in bill submitted. It seems that the Corporation has hired some specialized person for preparation of so called bills and quotations etc. as most of the bills are in same handwriting and contents of bills are also same.

Further, IHN investigation revealed that HFDC’s Kurukshetra Regional Office proved more intelligent than Gurgaon where they used window dressing methods to flout Income Tax provisions, by getting the bills of works done/ procurement by breaking the same into amounts below Rs.20000/-, along with forged quotations from same persons with each bill.

As per information with IHN, HFDC’s turnover since 2000-01 is as under which consist of sale of trees /wood, barbed wire, polythene bags, bank interests etc. till 2008 and w.e.f. 2009 included landscaping and other related jobs/ projects, which have contributed an average of 15 percent of total turnover :

Year
Turnover (Rs. In Lac)
Sales by Projects
Percent
2000-01
1865.79
-
-
2001-02
1404.08
-
-
2002-03
1243.24
-
-
2003-04
1363.75
-
-
2004-05
1193.88
-
-
2005-06
1449.66
-
-
2006-07
2074.98
-
-
2007-08
1932.39
-
-
2008-09
3146.06
93.26
02.96
2009-10
3619.26
434.01
11.99
2010-11
4566.66
849.11
18.59
2011-12
5577.81
Not Available
Not Available
                                                                                 Source: www.hdfc.gov.in andABCNIS Research

As mentioned above Corporation in 2009 had started taking arboriculture/ landscaping projects works, that too mostly out of Haryana, and also the game of cash transactions started and it is very strange that the company which has its headquarter in Panchkula has deputed only Gurgaon Regional Office to undertake the projects works on behalf of HFDC.

In most of vendors  from whom procurement/services have been hired they don’t have VAT /Service tax registration from respective department. In contrary to claim by department on its Website that they have paid 104 crores sale tax/VAT (source www.hfdc.gov.in), they have hidden the fact of theft of Vat/service tax/ Work Contract Tax, in crores of Rupees with connivance/ involvement  of officers of Corporation, thereby generating loss of revenue to Haryana and other State Governments and Centre.

On one hand, Government of India is emphasizing on cutting of cash transactions by way of amendments in Income Tax Act and other statutory laws, and also by making Permanent Account Number and ADHAR compulsory, whereas on the other hand corporation seems to be in hurry in distributing huge cash by way of expenditure.

When IHN Asked Mr. Ravi Sharma, a prominent lawyer in Punjab and Haryana High Court about large scale cash payments made by HFDC ignoring government and income tax laws, he categorically stated that as per section 40A (3) w.e.f 2009-10, where the assessee incurs any expenditure in respect of which a payment or aggregate of payments made to a person in a day, otherwise than account payee cheque or account payee bank draft, exceeds Rs 20000, no deduction shall be allowed in respect of such expenditure.”

The above mentioned fake fabrications of bills and quotations etc are only the few glimpses of sea of deliberately errors committed by HFDC officers to siphon money into their pockets. If any investigating agency will conduct thorough investigation into these fake fabrications of bills, scandal of crores of rupees would come out.  

When IHN research Team tried to know the version of Haryana Forests Minister, Capt. Ajay Singh Yadav about HFDC huge cash business transactions on his Mobile Number 09896422122, he categorically stated that we should talk to officers concerned and expressed his ignorance on the issue.

Further, when IHN talked to Mr. Subhash Chander Yadav, a Haryana Forests Services officer posted in Gurgaon as General Manager on his mobile number 09416415504 and asked him about cash transactions made by his office while doing arboriculture/ landscaping works at Deolali (Nasik) and Chandimandir (Panchkula), he refused to share anything about the issue and threatened IHN’s senior Journalist and disconnected the phone. It is pertinent to mention here that Mr. Yadav is holding the said charge for last many years except short term when he was posted in Mewat and again returned to cash milking position of HFDC, as he is said to be close to a Haryana Minister from Ahirwal region.

Further, the company has done projects of over Rs 25 crores since 2008 to 2012 in Regional Office Gurgaon and has suffered huge loss due to above mentioned fabrication in execution of projects works by company officers.

Last not the least, this open defying of statutory and government provisions by Haryana Forests Development Corporation while carrying its business, in public eyes, raises question mark over existing audit mechanism to keep transparency in working of public as well as private sector companies.
It is a point of question as to how various internal, external Government, statutory auditing and non auditing bodies have failed to point out these scams and serious lapses in business transactions, in their reports for all these years.

After prima facie investigation and inputs received from internal sources and by IHN Field team spread all over Haryana, it has been decided that soon IHN would publish detailed research report on entire working of HFDC on Financial & Non Financial scams.

Content Source: Intelligent Haryana News

North Dakota Governor William Langer (R) was removed from office in 1934 for alleged racketeering and barricaded himself in the Governor's mansion rather than leave

William Langer
William "Wild Bill" Langer  was a prominent US politician from North Dakota. Langer is one of the most colorful characters in North Dakota history, most famously bouncing back from a scandal that forced him out of the governor's office and into prison. He served as the 17th and 21st Governor of North Dakota from 1933 to 1934 and from 1937 to 1939. Langer also served in the United States Senate from 1940 to 1959 when he died in office.

In 1933, William "Fighting Bill" Langer took office as Governor of North Dakota. Although he was hugely popular, he soon exhausted his support when he demanded that state employees contribute to the state Republican party. As some of these salaries were paid with federal money, he was convicted of conspiring to defraud the U.S. government in June of 1934. Langer refused to accept the verdict or to resign from office. Ole Olsen, the lieutenant governor, asked the state's Supreme Court to order Langer to resign. On July 17, 1934, the Supreme Court of North Dakota declared Olsen the legitimate governor. Langer's reaction was not what the Supreme Court expected- before the Court's order was filed on the 18th, Langer met with ten of his friends and declared North Dakota's independence. He then barricaded the governor's mansion and declared martial law. Not until the Supreme Court met personally with Langer did he relent, revoking his declaration and bringing North Dakota back into the Union.
Incredibly, Langer was later re-elected. From all accounts, he served out his second term in a much quieter fashion.

SOURCES :  www.buckyogi.com